Thursday, 29 December 2011

Lane's Arabic-Engish Lexicon

The best Arabic-English lexicon is Lane's Arabic-English Lexicon
Here is a link to 5,100 articles, by root, done by Edward Lane.

Each "root" has its own article, and its own PDF file.

Here is the link to the lexicon :
Lane's Arabic-Engish Lexicon

These are PDF files, which are not supported in the browser on a Mac.
So the only way to view it is to download the individual PDFs.

Wednesday, 21 December 2011

Iran's Threat To "Wipe Israel Off The Map"


The "Wipe Israel Off The Map" Hoax
What Ahmadinejad really said and why this broken record is just another ad slogan for war

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, January 26, 2007

Barely a day goes by that one can avoid reading or hearing yet another Israeli, American or British warhawk regurgitate the broken record that Iran's President Ahmadinejad threatened to "wipe Israel off the map," framed in the ridiculous context that Israelis are being targeted for a second holocaust.

This baseless rallying call for conflict holds about as much credibility as Dick Cheney's assertion that Saddam Hussein was planning to light up American skies with mushroom clouds.

Today it's the turn of would-be future British Prime Minister David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party, who repeated the "wipe Israel off he map" fraud
in a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, using it to qualify his refusal to rule out a military strike on Iran under a Tory government.

Did Ahmadinejad really threaten to "wipe Israel off the map" or is this phrase just another jingoistic brand slogan for selling the next war in the Middle East?

The devil is in the detail, wiping Israel off the map suggests a physical genocidal assault, a literal population relocation or elimination akin to what the Nazis did.

According to numerous different translations, Ahmadinejad never used the word "map," instead his statement was in the context of time and applied to the Zionist regime occupying Jerusalem.

Ahmadinejad was expressing his future hope that the Zionist regime in Israel would fall, not that Iran was going to physically annex the country and its population.

To claim Ahmadinejad has issued a rallying cry to ethnically cleanse Israel is akin to saying that Churchill wanted to murder all Germans when he stated his desire to crush the Nazis. This is about the demise of a corrupt occupying power, not the deaths of millions of innocent people.
The Guardian's Jonathan Steele cites four different translations, from professors to the BBC to the New York Times and even pro-Israel news outlets, in none of those translations is the word "map" used.

The closest translation to what the Iranian President actually said is, "The regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time," or a narrow relative thereof.
In no version is the word "map" used or a context of mass genocide or hostile military action even hinted at.

The acceptance of the word "map" seemingly originated with the New York Times, who later had to back away from this false translation.

The BBC also wrongly used the word and, in comments to Steele, later accepted their mistake but refused to issue a retraction.

"The fact that he compared his desired option - the elimination of "the regime occupying Jerusalem" - with the fall of the Shah's regime in Iran makes it crystal clear that he is talking about regime change, not the end of Israel.

As a schoolboy opponent of the Shah in the 1970's he surely did not favor Iran's removal from the page of time.
He just wanted the Shah out," writes Steele.

"It's important to note that the "quote" in question was itself a quote,
writes Arash Norouzi, "they are the words of the late Ayatollah Khomeini, the father of the Islamic Revolution. Although he quoted Khomeini to affirm his own position on Zionism, the actual words belong to Khomeini and not Ahmadinejad.
Thus, Ahmadinejad has essentially been credited (or blamed) for a quote that is not only unoriginal, but represents a viewpoint already in place well before he ever took office."

Professor Juan Cole concurs, arguing, "Now, some might say, "So he didn't say, 'wipe off the map,' he said 'erase from the page.' What's the difference?

Anyway he's saying he wants to get rid of Israel.
Ahmadinejad was not making a threat, he was quoting a saying of Khomeini and urging that pro-Palestinian activists in Iran not give up hope -- that the occupation of Jerusalem was no more a continued inevitability than had been the hegemony of the Shah's government.

Whatever this quotation from a decades-old speech of Khomeini may have meant, Ahmadinejad did not say that 'Israel must be wiped off the map' with the implication that phrase has of Nazi-style extermination of a people.
He said that the occupation regime over Jerusalem must be erased from the page of time."

Videos On The Subject :

Ahmadinejad DID NOT Threaten To "Wipe Israel Off The Map."

Sunday, 11 December 2011

Deterrent Power

Deterrent Power is the potential to counter any threat from an enemy, by relying on one's own forces.

If Gaddafi had sufficent "Deterrent Power", such as nuclear weapons, then Libya would not have been attacked.

Also, many seem to think that Gaddafi was some cruel leader, but do you really think that even at his worst, that Gaddafi was worse than the United States???
Are you even aware of how cruel the American Government has been, especially how they have caused the deaths of millions upon millions of people around the world, often of innocent civilians??
For example, the million people in Iraq who died as a result of the Bush actions, resulting from the sanctions and attacks??

Or consider even how the United States supported Saddam Hussein in the Iraqi attack against your country Iran, in a war that caused the deaths of one million people??
Or the up to ten million people who died in the Korean war?
Or the up to two million people who died in the Viet Nam war?
We could go into the thousands of illegal lynchings, often of innocent lynching civilians in the US.
Or we could look at the over 15,000 executions by the US.
We could study the major terrorist activities committed by the US in Nicaragua.
Or then there are countless numbers of false flags and black operations committed by the US.
And the list goes on and on of the deaths that the United States has caused to tens of millions of people,
the majority being innocent civilians.

The fact is that the United States is a terrorist regime.
Some people may deny that, but those people are just being fools.

Yet Gaddafi NEVER caused anywhere near that amount of trouble and of deaths that the United States has caused.

Also, the fact remains that Gaddafi was one of the best leaders to his own people, out of almost any leader at anytime, any where.
NO American leader lifted up his own people anywhere close to how Gaddafi lifted up his own people and their living standards.

Gaddafi's problem is that he did NOT have enough "Deterrent Power" to keep the United States from attacking Libya. IF Gaddafi had nuclear weapons, then the United States would NOT have attacked Libya.
That is for sure.

Anyway, understand this, "Deterrent Power" prevents an aggressive country from attacking another country.
For decades, United States has wanted to use their US military to attack Russia (Soviet Union).
The NUMBER ONE reason why United States has not gone to war against Russia, is that Russia has the ultimate "Deterrent Power", which is nuclear weapons that would have been used against the United States.
THAT is why they fought the "Cold War".
Ever since after World War Two, NO country has started a war against the United States, because the US has the ultimate "Deterrent Power", which is nuclear weapons.
IF the US did not have nuclear weapons, then many countries would have used their militaries to go to war against the US and attacked the US.
It was exactly seventy years ago today (December 11, 2011) that Hitler declared war against the US, but at that time, Hitler did not know about the American atomic bombs.

Similarly, the same goes for Japan.

So, what you need to know is that it is reasonable and rational for your country to have nuclear weapons as a "Deterrent Power" to protect Iran from an attack by the United States and/or Israel.

I do NOT promote any country to have nuclear weapons.

But nuclear weapons are an irreversible fact of life.
So, if one county has nuclear weapons, then other countries have the right to have nuclear weapons to ONLY be used as a "Deterrent Power". It is a matter of moral relativism.

Wednesday, 7 December 2011

Nuclear Iran

Nothing is more rational than Iran’s wanting a nuclear weapon.

Imagine, for a moment, that you are an Iranian mullah.
Sitting crosslegged on your Persian rug in Tehran, sipping a cup of chai, you glance up at the map of the Middle East on the wall. 

It is a disturbing image: your country, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is surrounded on all sides by virulent enemies and regional rivals, both nuclear and non-nuclear.

On your eastern border, the United States has 100,000 troops serving in Afghanistan. 
On your western border, the US has been occupying Iraq since 2003 and plans to retain a small force of military contractors and CIA operatives even after its official withdrawal next month. 
Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nation, is to the south-east; 
Turkey, America's Nato ally, to the north-west; 
Turkmenistan, which has acted as a refuelling base for US military transport planes since 2002, to the north-east. 
To the south, across the Persian Gulf, you see a cluster of US client states: 
Bahrain, home to the US Fifth Fleet; Qatar, host to a forward headquarters of US Central Command; 
Saudi Arabia, whose king has exhorted America to "attack Iran" and "cut off the head of the snake".

Then, of course, less than a thousand miles to the west, there is Israel, your mortal enemy, in possession of over a hundred nuclear warheads and with a history of pre-emptive aggression against its opponents.

The map makes it clear: 
Iran is, literally, encircled by the United States and its allies.

If that wasn't worrying enough, your country seems to be under (covert) attack. 
Several nuclear scientists have been mysteriously assassinated and, late last year, a sophisticated computer virus succeeded in shutting down roughly a fifth of Iran's nuclear centrifuges. 

Only last weekend, the "pioneer" of the Islamic Republic's missile programme, Major General Hassan Moghaddam, was killed – with 16 others – in a huge explosion at a Revolutionary Guards base 25 miles outside Tehran. 

You go online to discover western journalists reporting that the Mossad is believed to have been behind the blast.

And then you pause to remind yourself of the fundamental geopolitical lesson that you and your countrymen learned over the last decade: the US and its allies opted for war with non-nuclear Iraq, but diplomacy with nuclear-armed North Korea.

If you were our mullah in Tehran, wouldn't you want Iran to have the bomb – or at the very minimum, "nuclear latency" (that is, the capability and technology to quickly build a nuclear weapon if threatened with attack)?

Let's be clear: there is still no concrete evidence Iran is building a bomb.
The latest report from the IAEA, despite its much discussed reference to "possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear programme", also admits that its inspectors continue "to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material at [Iran's] nuclear facilities". 
The leaders of the Islamic Republic – from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei to bombastic President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – maintain their goal is only to develop a civilian nuclear programme, not atomic bombs.

Nonetheless, wouldn't it be rational for Iran – geographically encircled, politically isolated, feeling threatened – to want its own arsenal of nukes, for defensive and deterrent purposes? 
The US government's Nuclear Posture Review admits such weapons play an "essential role in deterring potential adversaries" and maintaining "strategic stability" with other nuclear powers. 

In 2006, the UK's Ministry of Defence claimed our own strategic nuclear deterrent was designed to "deter and prevent nuclear blackmail and acts of aggression against our vital interests that cannot be countered by other means".

Apparently, what is sauce for the Anglo-American goose is not sauce for the Iranian gander. Empathy is in short supply. 
As leading US nuclear policy analyst George Perkovich has observed: 
"The US government never has publicly and objectively assessed Iranian leaders' motivations for seeking nuclear weapons and what the US and others could do to remove those motivations." 
Instead, the Islamic Republic is dismissed as irrational and megalomaniacal.

But it isn't just Iran's leaders who are unwilling to back down on the nuclear issue. 
On Tuesday, around 1,000 Iranian students formed a human chain around the uranium conversion facility in Isfahan, chanting "Death to America" and "Death to Israel". 
Their protest may have been organised by the authorities but even the leaders and members of the opposition Green Movement tend to support Iran's uranium enrichment programme. 
According to a 2010 University of Maryland survey, 55% of Iranians back their country's pursuit of nuclear power and, remarkably, 38% support the building of a nuclear bomb.

So what is to be done?
 Sanctions haven't worked and won't work. Iranians refuse to compromise on what they believe to be their "inalienable" right to nuclear power under the Non-proliferation treaty. 
Military action, as the US defence secretary Leon Panetta admitted last week, could have "unintended consequences", including a backlash against "US forces in the region". 
The threat of attack will only harden the resolve for a nuclear deterrent; belligerence breeds belligerence.

The simple fact is there is no alternative to diplomacy, no matter how truculent or paranoid the leaders of Iran might seem to western eyes. 
If a nuclear-armed Iran is to be avoided, US politicians have to dial down their threatening rhetoric and tackle the very real and rational perception, on the streets of Tehran and Isfahan, of America and Israel as military threats to the Islamic Republic. 
Iranians are fearful, nervous, defensive – and, as the Middle East map shows, perhaps with good reason. 
As the old adage goes, just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

George Orwell on the Evil Iranian Menace -

See: George Orwell on the Evil Iranian Menace -

There Is No Son From God

The number one issue dividing Muslims from Christians, is the conflict of whether or not there is a son from God.

There is no issue that is pushing the world into World War Three,
as much as the issue of whether Jesus is a son from God.

Also, Muslims say that the churches have altered the bibles, making the churches' bibles to be no more than forgeries, to conform to the Christian agenda.

The Koran makes it loud and clear that there is no son from God; that Jesus is not a son from God.

What do the Christian bibles say?
Any verses from the oldest bibles, which say that there is no son from God, have been deleted from modern Churches' bibles.

The Latin bibles deleted any verse that says that there is no son from God.

Both the Greek-based and Hebrew-based bibles (Septuagint, King James, NIV, etc.) have also deleted any verse that says that there is no son from God.

But in fact, there are Christian bibles in use today, which state that there is no son from God.
Those verses are found in the Aramaic (Syriac) Peshitta, which is used throughout the non-Western countries.

לית בר מן אללה
= There is no son FROM Allah
That is Aramaic (not Hebrew).
The Hebrew letters use Aramaic letters.

ليس إبن من الله

That statement (and dialect variations of it) appears at least in seventy (70) places in old ancient Aramaic bibles.
But that statement was deleted from the churches’ modern bibles.
There are in fact many ancient Aramaic Bibles which are still available.

Those Aramaic bibles go back thousands of years.
Those Aramaic bibles are older than the churches.


Note :
لست بنالله = There is no benallah
لست بن الله = There is no son of Allah
ليس إبن من الله = There is no son FROM Allah

Israeli & Palestinian Wars

A must see videos :
Jewish Man Exposes Israel's Lies

Testimony Of Amnon Neumann

For a British report on Israeli violence in Gaza against not only Palestinian civilians, but international aid volunteers and foreign reporters as well, see
The Killing Zone

More Videos About Palestinians And Gaza :

Norman Finkelstein: There was NO WAR in GAZA, it was a MASSACRE

Tears of Gaza

Cleansing Gaza - Israel/Palestine

Gaza, Where Should The Birds Fly?

Neturei Karta

The Neturei Karta are ultra‑orthodox Jews, who work hard at being pious, righteous and peaceful.

Neturei Karta Jews are good friends with Muslims, Arabs and Iranians.

The Neturei Karta are are utterly appalled at the treatments of Palestinians; and they stand up for the Palestinians and their rights.

Many of Neturei Karta Jews live in Israel, as well as in other parts of the world, including the United States.

Neturei Karta Jews so not recognize the state of Israel.

Neturei Karta Jews are strongly opposed to Zionists.

Likewise, Zionists oppose Neturei Karta Jews.

The Neturei Karta has a website at

Videos of Neturei Karta :

Rabbi Weiss Rips The Ideology Of Zionism

Rabbis For Human Rights

There is a group called the "Rabbis For Human Rights",
They work long and hard for the Palestinians and their rights.

To see some of their work for Palestinians, see their website at
Palestinians Rights.

Their main webpage is at Rabbis For Human Rights.

Their FaceBook account is at Rabbis For Human Rights.

Americans And Westerners Need To Understand

What Americans And Other Westerners Need To Understand :


Most of non-western countries world hate American foreign policies.

A main reason that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization was formed, is a result of American foreign policies.

Formed in 2001 by Russia, China, and Central Asian countries, the SCO stands united against Western imperialism and NATO warmongering.

The Sino-Russian economic and military alliance intention is to act as a mighty spearhead against the forces of U.S interventionism and unilateralism.

Once the westerners understand that it is their own hegemony, imperialisms, colonizations, expansionisms, crusades, inquisitions, capitalisms, support for Zionism, and the like, are causing the problems, then the westerners can start to change their foreign policies in such a way that everyone can live without militaries and wars.

Then the tens of Trillions of dollars, which are being utterly wasted on militaries and wars, can be used for building up this world in an altruistic manner consistent with the Will of God, to create farms for food, building water supplies for everyone, a house and home for everyone, schools, libraries, hospitals, roads, bridges, renewable energy systems (instead of oil, gas and coal), sciences, and all those other things wanted and needed, so that EVERY single person can have a good decent life, without the starvation, poverty, misery, killings, murders, rapes, tortures, battles, wars, and all of the other cruel, evil, wicked, barbaric atrocities that human beings have had to put up with for so very long.

World War Three can easily end the United States.

Many people do not realize that World War Three is in fact already in existence.

It is merely only the perception that World War Three has not yet materialized.

World War Three is in fact occuring as you read this, even though WW3 is not yet in full swing.

Once World War Three is in full swing, someone will be stupid enough to start using nuclear weapons.

Then there will be nuclear retaliation.


The Iranian President Ahmadinejad is NOT saying that he believes the holocaust never happened.

It is Western media propaganda to say otherwise, saying that Ahmadinejad denies that the Holocaust ever happened.

Ahmadinejad is saying that an independent review is needed to investigate the facts about the holocaust.

Many people is many countries simply do not believe the "official version" of the holocaust.

Ahmadinejad does NOT hate Jews.

In fact there are Jews in the Iranian Parilament.

There are at least 25,000 Jews living in Iran.

Ahmadinejad is even very good friends with ultra‑orthodox rabbis.

As are numerous peoples and countries around the world, Ahmadinejad is against the cruel, barbaric and inhumane treatment by the Zionists against the Palestinians, especially in Gaza.

But virtually EVERYONE is agaist the Zionists, once they become aware of the cruel, barbaric and inhumane treatment by the Zionists against the Palestinians.

Many in this world are against the United States because of American foreign policies and because of American support for the Zionists, because of the atrocities that the Israeli government inflicts on the Palestinians, especially in Gaza.

In fact, there are large numbers of Jewish people who are against Zionism and against the barbaric, cruel and inhumane atrocities that the Israeli government pours out against the Palestinians.

For example, there is a group of Israeli Jews, called the "Rabbis For Human Rights", who work long and hard to protect Palestinians and their rights.

Also for example, the ultra‑orthodox Jews, called the Neturei Karta, many of whom live in Israel, are utterly appalled at the treatments of Palestinians; and they stand up for the Palestinians and their rights.

There are many, many Jews, both individually and collectively in groups, who are saying enough is enough, stop the abuse of Palestinians and treat them as human beings.

The Iranian Ahmadinejad does NOT call the shots in Iran.

Ahmadinejad actually has very little control as to what Iran can or cannot do.

There are at least three powers in Iran, who control Iran by far more than does Ahmadinejad :

1) The Ayatollah

2) The Majlis (مجلس شورای اسلامی the Islamic Consultative Assembly, which is the Iranian parliament)

3) The Guardian Council

Iran has NOT attacked any country in over three‑hundred years.
OVER 300 years.

But on the other hand, the United States has attacked numerous other countries, has caused the deaths of numerous MILLIONS of people, often innocent civilians, and started several wars, including Viet Nam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, and several others, especially including Nicaragua and others both in Central America and in South America.

Nuclear weapons aside, the Iranian military is at least as a third as powerful as the American military.

Iran does in fact have a very large, powerful and advanced military, with very sophisticated weapons.

Both Russia and China side with Iran, and NOT to NATO and United States and their allies.

Videos About Jewish People in Iran :

Jesus Christ The Messiah

Depending on who is doing the estimate, there are between one Billion to two Billion Muslims living on the planet Earth.

That means that for every American, there are between three to six Muslims on Earth.
Muslims by far outnumber the number of Americans.

What many Christians do not realize is that every single Muslim accepts and acknowledges the Christ, Jesus the Messiah.
Every single Muslim can and will obey Jesus The Messiah.
It is not optional for a Muslim to disobey Jesus the Messiah. 

The big push in the United States against Iran and other Muslim countries, is by Christians, known as "Christian Zionists".

The United States has about 45 to 50 million of these "Christian Zionists".
These "Christian Zionists" are not Jews.

It is the Christian Zionists who are pushing the war-mongering neoconservatives.

These Christian Zionists are pushing the US government to attack Iran, which is a Muslim nation, who already accepts the Christ, Jesus The Messiah.

The Christian Zionists think that they need to do work for Jesus The Messiah, by supporting Jewish Zionists and by attacking the Muslim Iran. 

Those Christian Zionists are most horribly and extremely deluded that they are doing Jesus any good by pushing the US government into attacking Iran.

Jesus does NOT need Christian Zionists to go to war against a Muslim country, who already accepts Jesus The Messiah, the Christ, son of Mary.
Every Muslim will obey Jesus, thus there is no reason for Christian Zionists to push the United States government to go to war against any Muslim country.

Nuclear Ice Age

Also known as "Nuclear Darkness" and "Nuclear Famine"


There are scientists who have made studies and all the calculations for the following about the Nuclear Ice Age :

Nuclear bombs will set off nuclear clouds.

These nuclear clouds will arise higher than the normal rain clouds.

Because the nuclear clouds are higher than the normal rain clouds, the normal rain clouds cannot “wash away” the particles in the nuclear clouds.

Thus, for many years, the nuclear clouds will block out much of the sunshine to the planet Earth, as well as the heat to the ground.

Thus, the nuclear clouds will literally throw the planet Earth into a NUCLEAR ICE AGE.

This nuclear ice age will kill off Billions of people.

For more details and information, see:

What is Nuclear Darkness?

Consequences Of Nuclear Weapons (PDF)

Environmental Consequences Of Nuclear War (PDF)

Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Russia is close ally with Iran.
China is close ally with Iran.

Both Russia and China have prepared for war against the United States and against NATO, especially if either the United States or Israel attack Iran.

Both Russia and China are part of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) coalition.

The SCO is a major superpower, or even the superpower on Earth.

Formed in 2001 by Russia, China, and Central Asian countries, the SCO stands united against Western imperialism and NATO warmongering.
The Sino-Russian economic and military alliance intention is to act as a mighty spearhead against the forces of U.S interventionism and unilateralism.

When the United States attacks Iran, then Russia and China will attack the United States coalition.

The rest of the SCO coalition will fight against the United States.

The core motive for the formation of the SCO is to counterbalance and eventually combat the Western forces, especially NATO.

In case of war, both Russia and China have allegiance to the SCO.

During WW3, neither Russia nor China will have allegiance to NATO.

The SCO coalition being formed includes the vast bulk of the former Soviet Union, a vast majority of Muslim countries, and a vast majority of the Asian countries.

The SCO coalition and its allies includes Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mongolia, Syria, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and other countries.

If the United States and/or Israeli attack Iran, will in fact set off World War Three, which will eventually destroy the United States, because the United States is NOT the super power which Americans are deluded into thinking that they are.

The United States simply does not have the military strength to win a war against its enemies.

The number of soldiers in the SCO coalition and its allies, by far outnumbers the soldiers in the American military by several hundred to each American soldier.

The weapons in the SCO coalition by far exceeds the weapons in the American coalition.

For those Americans who fail to understand that China loves Pakistan, and fails to understand that China and Pakistan are best of friends, and fails to understand that China will attack any country that goes to war against Pakistan, THEN that American also fails to understand the utter and extreme danger that the United States currently faces due to American foreign policies.



Ron Paul is an extremely good man, and I most seriously suggest to you to start LISTENING to him, because as it stands right now, Ron Paul is the only chance for the survival of the United States.

Russia, China and Pakistan are all allies with or part of the SCO, which has the power and ability to wipe out the end of the United States.

The SCO is more than willing and able to destroy the United States.

India and Pakistan have differences, but many ties are being built between India and Pakistan.

For numerous reasons, BOTH India and Pakistan are being part of the SCO, and the Indo‑Pak differences are being put aside.

This means that the SCO coalition will include Pakistan, India, Russia, China, and numerous other countries, all who are willing to go to war against the western countries, especially against the United States.


World War Three can easily end the United States.

Many people do not realize that World War Three is in fact already in existance.

It is merely only the perception that World War Three has not yet materialized.

World War Three is in fact occuring as you read this, even though WW3 is not yet in full swing.

Once World War Three is in full swing, someone will be stupid enough to start using nuclear weapons.

Then there will be nuclear retaliation.

World War 3

As soon as either the United States or Israel attack Iran, that is when World War III will swing into full action.

Deaths during World War 2 are estimated between sixty Million to eighty Million people. 60,000,000 to 80,000,000 people.
Some estimates go quite a bit higher.

But with a nuclear war, the actual number of deaths during Word War III can easily exceed a Billion people.